RFI (Request for Information) in Construction

July 9, 2025

The RFI process typically begins when a contractor or subcontractor encounters missing, or contradictory information in project documents during construction.

"Stacking Atoms" is a series by Foundamental that explores construction's unique processes, hidden workflows, and unwritten rules and norms across different segments, stakeholder profiles, and global markets. Stacking Atoms is for all those hungry to learn about construction and AEC - the founders, the innovators, and the experts with a passion to pick up new knowledge about the building-world. Our intention is not to perfectly describe the last bit of detail - a monumental task we would never succeed in, anyway, as that knowledge lives in the minds of construction's best practitioners. Rather, we aim to spotlight a good amount of detail so the brightest founders and innovators can connect with the brightest minds in construction around the workflows that matter.

Bridging the Gap When Drawings Fall Short

What Is an RFI in Construction?

A Request for Information (RFI) is a formal document used in construction projects to request clarification or additional information when project drawings, specifications, or other contract documents lack sufficient detail for proper execution. RFIs serve as a critical communication tool between contractors, subcontractors, architects, engineers, and project owners, ensuring that all parties have the necessary information to complete work accurately and efficiently.

The RFI process represents one of the most fundamental yet often overlooked aspects of construction project management, acting as a safety net when the inevitable gaps in project documentation surface during construction phases.

The Mechanics of RFI Processing: How It Works

The RFI process typically begins when a contractor or subcontractor encounters ambiguous, missing, or contradictory information in project documents during construction. The requesting party prepares a formal RFI document that includes the specific question or issue, relevant drawing references, project location details, and the urgency level of the request.

Once submitted, the RFI enters a review workflow where it's typically routed to the architect or engineer responsible for that particular aspect of the project. The design professional reviews the request, consults with other team members if necessary, and provides a written response that may include clarifications, revised drawings, or additional specifications.

The entire process is documented and tracked, creating a permanent record of all communications and decisions made during construction. Most projects establish specific timeframes for RFI responses, typically ranging from 5 to 14 days depending on the complexity and urgency of the request.

Common Triggers for RFI Submissions

RFIs are most commonly generated when drawings lack sufficient detail for construction crews to proceed confidently. This includes situations where dimensions are missing or unclear, material specifications are vague or contradictory, construction details are incomplete, or conflicts exist between different drawing sheets or disciplines.

Equipment and system installations frequently generate RFIs when exact placement locations aren't specified, connection details are unclear, or coordination between different trades needs clarification. Additionally, field conditions that differ from what was shown in the original drawings often necessitate RFI submissions to determine appropriate solutions.

The Problems and Challenges of RFI Management

Project Delays and Cost Implications

Excessive RFI volumes can significantly impact project schedules and costs. When critical information is delayed, work must often stop or be reworked, leading to schedule compression and potential cost overruns. The administrative burden of processing numerous RFIs can also strain project teams and slow decision-making processes.

Quality of RFI Submissions

Poor-quality RFI submissions that lack specific details, proper references, or clear questions can lead to inadequate responses and multiple rounds of clarification. This creates a cycle of inefficiency that compounds project delays and frustrates all parties involved.

Communication Breakdowns

RFIs can sometimes become tools for documenting problems rather than seeking solutions, leading to adversarial relationships between project participants. When not managed properly, the RFI process can deteriorate into a defensive mechanism rather than a collaborative problem-solving tool.

Best Practices for Effective RFI Management

Successful RFI management requires clear protocols established at project inception. This includes defining response timeframes, establishing review hierarchies, and creating standardized formats that ensure all necessary information is captured consistently.

Quality control measures should be implemented to ensure RFIs are thoroughly researched before submission, include all relevant documentation, and present clear, specific questions. Regular RFI tracking and analysis can help identify patterns and systemic issues that might be addressed proactively.

Project teams should also establish protocols for urgent RFIs that require immediate attention, ensuring that critical path activities aren't unnecessarily delayed by standard review processes.

Technology's Impact on RFI Processing

Digital transformation has significantly improved RFI management efficiency. Cloud-based project management platforms now provide real-time tracking, automated routing, and integrated communication tools that streamline the entire RFI workflow. Mobile applications enable field personnel to submit RFIs with photos and voice notes directly from the jobsite.

Building Information Modeling (BIM) technology is reducing RFI volumes by providing more detailed and coordinated design information upfront. Advanced clash detection and model coordination help identify potential issues before they become field problems requiring RFI resolution.

Artificial intelligence and machine learning are beginning to emerge as tools for RFI analysis, helping identify patterns and predict potential issues based on historical project data.

Emerging Startups in RFI Management

Several innovative companies are addressing RFI challenges through technology solutions. Fieldwire provides mobile-first project management tools that streamline RFI submission and tracking processes, while Procore offers comprehensive construction management platforms with integrated RFI workflows.

PlanGrid (part of Autodesk) revolutionized mobile access to project documents and RFI processing, and Buildertrend focuses on residential construction with user-friendly RFI management features integrated into their project management suite.

Future Trends in RFI Management

The construction industry is moving toward more proactive approaches to information management that could significantly reduce RFI volumes. Advanced design coordination tools, enhanced BIM workflows, and improved specification writing practices are helping create more complete and accurate project documentation.

Virtual and augmented reality technologies are emerging as tools for better design communication and review, potentially reducing ambiguities that lead to RFI submissions. Predictive analytics based on historical RFI data are also being developed to help identify potential problem areas before they impact construction.

The integration of artificial intelligence in design review processes may eventually automate the identification and resolution of common RFI-generating issues, further streamlining the construction process.

Conclusion: The Critical Role of RFIs in Construction Success

RFIs remain an essential component of construction project delivery, serving as a vital communication bridge when project documents fall short of providing complete construction guidance. While they can be seen as indicators of incomplete design or poor project planning, RFIs actually represent a mature industry practice that acknowledges the impossibility of anticipating every construction scenario in advance.

The key to successful RFI management lies not in eliminating them entirely, but in establishing efficient processes that facilitate quick, accurate responses while maintaining comprehensive documentation. As construction technology continues to evolve, the RFI process will likely become more streamlined and proactive, but its fundamental role in ensuring project clarity and quality will remain unchanged.

Projects that embrace RFI management as a collaborative tool rather than a necessary evil typically achieve better outcomes, stronger relationships, and more successful project delivery.

FAQs About RFIs in Construction

How long should RFI responses take?

RFI response times typically range from 5 to 14 days, depending on the complexity of the request and project requirements. Standard RFIs usually receive responses within 7-10 days, while urgent requests may be addressed within 24-48 hours. Response timeframes should be clearly defined in project contracts and consistently enforced.

Who is responsible for responding to RFIs?

The architect or engineer of record typically responds to RFIs related to their scope of work. For complex issues, the design professional may need to consult with other team members, specialty consultants, or the project owner before providing a response. The project manager usually coordinates the review process and ensures timely responses.

Can RFIs be avoided entirely?

While RFIs cannot be completely eliminated, their volume can be significantly reduced through thorough design coordination, comprehensive specifications, detailed construction documents, and effective pre-construction planning. Advanced technologies like BIM and improved design review processes help identify and resolve potential issues before they reach the field.