Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR)

"Stacking Atoms" is a series by Foundamental that explores construction's unique processes, hidden workflows, and unwritten rules and norms across different segments, stakeholder profiles, and global markets. Stacking Atoms is for all those hungry to learn about construction and AEC - the founders, the innovators, and the experts with a passion to pick up new knowledge about the building-world. Our intention is not to perfectly describe the last bit of detail - a monumental task we would never succeed in, anyway, as that knowledge lives in the minds of construction's best practitioners. Rather, we aim to spotlight a good amount of detail so the brightest founders and innovators can connect with the brightest minds in construction around the workflows that matter.

What Is Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR)?

Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) is a project delivery method that combines the advisory role of a construction manager with the financial responsibility of a general contractor. In CMAR contracts, the construction manager provides preconstruction services during the design phase and then guarantees a maximum price for the construction work. This approach allows owners to benefit from early contractor involvement while maintaining cost certainty through a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP). The construction manager assumes the financial risk for cost overruns beyond the agreed maximum price, creating a unique balance of collaboration and accountability that has become increasingly popular in complex construction projects.

The Mechanics of CMAR: How the Process Works

The CMAR process typically unfolds in two distinct phases that leverage the construction manager's expertise throughout the project lifecycle. During the preconstruction phase, the construction manager works closely with the design team and owner to provide constructability reviews, value engineering suggestions, cost estimating, and scheduling input. This early involvement allows for real-time feedback on design decisions and their cost implications, often leading to more efficient and cost-effective project outcomes.

Once the design reaches a sufficient level of completion, typically around 60-90% design development, the construction manager provides a Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal. This GMP includes all construction costs, general conditions, overhead, profit, and contingencies. After the owner accepts the GMP, the construction manager transitions into the construction phase, assuming full responsibility for delivering the project within the guaranteed price while managing all subcontractors and construction activities.

The financial structure often includes shared savings provisions, where any costs below the GMP are split between the owner and construction manager according to predetermined percentages, creating incentives for efficient project delivery.

Challenges and Controversies in CMAR Implementation

Risk Allocation and Pricing Concerns

Critics of CMAR contracts point to several inherent challenges in the delivery method. The timing of GMP establishment can create tension between owners wanting early price certainty and construction managers needing sufficient design information to provide accurate pricing. When designs are incomplete, construction managers may inflate contingencies to protect against unknown risks, potentially eliminating cost benefits for owners.

Scope Definition and Change Management

CMAR contracts require careful scope definition to avoid disputes over what is included in the guaranteed maximum price. Changes to the project scope after GMP establishment can lead to contentious negotiations, particularly when determining whether modifications fall within the original scope or constitute legitimate change orders. The collaborative nature of early involvement can sometimes blur the lines of responsibility, making it difficult to assign accountability for design-related issues.

Selection and Procurement Challenges

The procurement process for CMAR contracts often emphasizes qualifications over price, which can raise concerns about competitive fairness. Some jurisdictions have struggled to adapt traditional low-bid statutes to accommodate the qualifications-based selection typically required for successful CMAR implementation.

Best Practices for Successful CMAR Projects

Successful CMAR implementation relies heavily on clear contract terms and effective project management processes. Establishing detailed scope definitions, comprehensive change order procedures, and transparent cost accounting systems helps prevent disputes and maintains project momentum. Regular cost reporting and open-book accounting build trust between parties while ensuring cost visibility throughout construction.

Team selection proves critical to CMAR success, with owners benefiting from choosing construction managers with strong preconstruction capabilities and collaborative working styles. Early establishment of project goals, communication protocols, and decision-making authorities helps align all parties and facilitates smooth project execution.

Risk management strategies should clearly delineate responsibilities for different types of project risks, including design errors, unforeseen conditions, and regulatory changes. Well-structured contingency management and shared savings agreements create proper incentives while protecting both parties' interests.

Technology's Impact on CMAR Delivery

Modern construction technology significantly enhances CMAR project delivery through improved collaboration and cost management capabilities. Building Information Modeling (BIM) enables more accurate cost estimating during preconstruction and facilitates better constructability reviews. Cloud-based project management platforms provide real-time cost tracking and transparent reporting, essential for maintaining trust in CMAR relationships.

Advanced estimating software helps construction managers provide more accurate GMPs earlier in the design process, while integrated scheduling and cost management tools enable better project control during construction. Digital document management systems ensure all parties have access to current project information, reducing miscommunication and potential disputes.

Artificial intelligence and machine learning tools are beginning to enhance risk assessment and cost prediction in CMAR contracts, helping construction managers develop more accurate contingency planning and pricing strategies.

Emerging Startups in CMAR Technology

Several innovative companies are developing technology solutions specifically for CMAR project delivery. Nivel provides cloud-based cost management and GMP tracking tools designed for complex construction projects. Their platform enables real-time cost monitoring and automated reporting, crucial for CMAR transparency requirements.

Buildots leverages computer vision and AI to provide automated progress tracking and cost verification, helping construction managers maintain accurate cost projections against their guaranteed maximum prices. Their technology provides objective project monitoring that supports the collaborative nature of CMAR relationships.

Voyage Control offers integrated project controls software that combines scheduling, cost management, and risk analysis specifically designed for alternative delivery methods like CMAR. Their platform helps construction managers better predict and manage the financial risks inherent in guaranteed maximum price contracts.

Future Trends in CMAR Implementation

The CMAR delivery method continues evolving as the construction industry embraces more collaborative approaches to project delivery. Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) concepts are being incorporated into CMAR contracts, creating even more collaborative relationships between all project stakeholders. This evolution includes shared risk models that extend beyond the traditional owner-construction manager relationship to include key design professionals and subcontractors.

Sustainability and performance-based contracting are increasingly being integrated into CMAR agreements, with guaranteed maximum prices extending to operational performance metrics rather than just construction costs. This trend reflects growing owner interest in long-term building performance and lifecycle cost management.

The rise of modular and prefabricated construction is also influencing CMAR implementation, as construction managers can provide more accurate pricing for standardized building components while still maintaining the flexibility and collaboration benefits of the delivery method.

Economic Impact and Market Adoption

CMAR has gained significant traction in both public and private sectors, particularly for complex projects where early contractor involvement provides substantial value. Public agencies increasingly recognize CMAR's ability to deliver projects on schedule and within budget while maintaining competitive procurement processes. The method has proven particularly effective for healthcare, educational, and infrastructure projects where technical complexity benefits from early contractor input.

Market data suggests CMAR projects often achieve better schedule performance compared to traditional design-bid-build delivery, with the collaborative approach reducing conflicts and change orders that typically cause delays and cost overruns.

Conclusion: The Strategic Value of CMAR in Modern Construction

Construction Manager at Risk represents a sophisticated evolution in construction project delivery that addresses many shortcomings of traditional contracting methods. By combining early contractor involvement with guaranteed maximum pricing, CMAR creates a framework that promotes collaboration while maintaining cost certainty for project owners.

The success of CMAR implementation depends heavily on proper contract structuring, team selection, and project management execution. When implemented effectively, CMAR can deliver superior project outcomes through improved constructability, reduced conflicts, and better cost and schedule performance.

As the construction industry continues to embrace more collaborative delivery methods, CMAR provides a proven framework that balances innovation with risk management. The method's flexibility allows it to adapt to emerging technologies and evolving project requirements while maintaining the fundamental benefits of early contractor involvement and guaranteed pricing.

FAQs About Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR)

How does CMAR differ from traditional general contracting?

CMAR differs from traditional general contracting primarily through early involvement and risk allocation. In CMAR, the construction manager participates during design development, providing preconstruction services before establishing a guaranteed maximum price. Traditional general contractors typically enter projects after design completion through competitive bidding. CMAR emphasizes collaboration and shared responsibility, while traditional contracting maintains more adversarial relationships between parties.

What happens if construction costs exceed the Guaranteed Maximum Price?

When construction costs exceed the GMP, the construction manager is financially responsible for the overrun, assuming the excess costs result from factors within their control. However, legitimate change orders for owner-requested modifications or unforeseen conditions typically allow GMP adjustments. The contract terms specifically define what circumstances permit GMP increases versus what costs the construction manager must absorb, making clear contract language essential for successful CMAR implementation.

Is CMAR suitable for all types of construction projects?

CMAR works best for complex projects where early contractor involvement provides significant value, such as healthcare facilities, educational buildings, and technical infrastructure projects. Simple projects with straightforward designs may not benefit enough from preconstruction services to justify CMAR's typically higher procurement costs. The method is most effective when project owners value collaboration, schedule certainty, and constructability input more than achieving the absolute lowest initial bid price.

‍