Suicide Bidding in Construction

"Stacking Atoms" is a series by Foundamental that explores construction's unique processes, hidden workflows, and unwritten rules and norms across different segments, stakeholder profiles, and global markets. Stacking Atoms is for all those hungry to learn about construction and AEC - the founders, the innovators, and the experts with a passion to pick up new knowledge about the building-world. Our intention is not to perfectly describe the last bit of detail - a monumental task we would never succeed in, anyway, as that knowledge lives in the minds of construction's best practitioners. Rather, we aim to spotlight a good amount of detail so the brightest founders and innovators can connect with the brightest minds in construction around the workflows that matter.

What Is Suicide Bidding in Construction?

Suicide bidding is a high-risk construction practice where contractors intentionally submit bids at or below their actual project costs, with the strategic hope of recovering losses through change orders, claims, or future work. This desperate bidding strategy gets its name from the potentially fatal consequences it can have on a contractor's business, as it essentially guarantees an initial loss on the base contract. Contractors engaging in suicide bidding typically operate under the assumption that they can identify profitable opportunities during project execution that weren't included in the original scope of work.

The practice is most commonly observed during economic downturns, in highly competitive markets, or when contractors are struggling to maintain cash flow and need work to keep their operations running. While it may appear to be a viable short-term survival strategy, suicide bidding often leads to financial distress, project disputes, and damaged relationships with clients and subcontractors.

The Mechanics of Suicide Bidding: How It Works

The Bidding Strategy

Suicide bidding typically begins with a contractor's deliberate decision to submit a bid below their calculated break-even point. This calculation involves determining the true cost of materials, labor, equipment, overhead, and reasonable profit margins, then deliberately undercutting this figure. Contractors employing this strategy often reduce their bids by removing contingencies, eliminating profit margins entirely, or even pricing below direct costs.

The strategy relies heavily on the contractor's ability to identify potential change order opportunities during the project. These might include scope clarifications, design modifications, unforeseen conditions, or additional work requests that weren't part of the original contract. The contractor essentially gambles that these additional revenue streams will more than compensate for the initial loss.

Recovery Mechanisms

Contractors practicing suicide bidding typically employ several recovery mechanisms. Change order management becomes critical, with contractors aggressively pursuing every possible scope modification or additional work opportunity. Claims management also plays a significant role, as contractors may seek compensation for delays, design errors, or other issues that impact project costs. Some contractors also bank on the possibility that winning one project at a loss might lead to additional profitable work with the same client.

The Dangerous Consequences: Why Suicide Bidding Is Problematic

Financial Risks and Business Failure

Suicide bidding creates numerous serious risks for construction businesses. The most obvious danger is the potential for catastrophic financial loss if the anticipated change orders or claims don't materialize as expected. This can lead to cash flow problems, inability to pay subcontractors and suppliers, and ultimately business failure. The practice also damages the contractor's creditworthiness and bonding capacity, making future work more difficult to obtain.

Project Quality and Client Relationships

When contractors are operating at a loss on the base contract, they often face pressure to cut corners wherever possible. This can result in compromised quality, slower project delivery, and increased disputes with clients. The adversarial relationship that develops when contractors aggressively pursue change orders can damage long-term client relationships and harm the contractor's reputation in the market.

Impact on Subcontractors and Suppliers

Suicide bidding often has cascading effects throughout the supply chain. Contractors operating at a loss may delay payments to subcontractors and suppliers, creating financial stress throughout the project team. This can lead to reduced quality of work, project delays, and damaged relationships that affect future collaborations.

Industry Perspectives: Ethical and Legal Considerations

Professional Ethics

Most construction industry organizations consider suicide bidding to be unethical and detrimental to the industry as a whole. The practice contributes to an unhealthy race to the bottom in pricing, undermines fair competition, and can lead to widespread financial instability within the construction sector. Professional associations often discourage the practice through codes of ethics and educational programs.

Legal Implications

While suicide bidding itself is not illegal, it can lead to legal complications. Contractors who cannot complete projects due to financial constraints may face breach of contract claims. Additionally, aggressive change order and claims strategies can result in disputes, litigation, and potential accusations of fraudulent bidding practices if contractors misrepresent their capabilities or intentions.

Prevention and Alternative Strategies: Building Sustainable Business Practices

Proper Cost Estimation

The most effective prevention against suicide bidding is implementing robust cost estimation practices. This includes comprehensive project analysis, accurate material and labor cost calculations, appropriate contingency allowances, and realistic profit margin expectations. Contractors should also consider their overhead costs, bonding requirements, and cash flow needs when developing bids.

Market Diversification and Specialization

Contractors can reduce the temptation to engage in suicide bidding by diversifying their market presence or developing specialized expertise that commands premium pricing. Building strong relationships with clients who value quality and reliability over lowest price can also provide more sustainable business opportunities.

Financial Management and Planning

Strong financial management practices, including maintaining adequate working capital, establishing credit lines, and developing comprehensive business plans, can help contractors avoid the desperate situations that often lead to suicide bidding. Regular financial monitoring and forecasting can help identify potential problems before they become critical.

Technology's Role: Digital Tools for Better Bidding

Advanced Estimating Software

Modern construction technology offers sophisticated estimating tools that can help contractors develop more accurate bids and avoid the temptation of suicide bidding. These systems provide detailed cost databases, real-time material pricing, and advanced analytics that can improve bidding accuracy and identify genuine opportunities for competitive advantage.

Project Management Platforms

Comprehensive project management software can help contractors better track project costs, manage change orders, and maintain profitability throughout project execution. These tools provide real-time visibility into project performance and can help contractors make informed decisions about pricing and project management.

Financial Tracking and Analytics

Advanced financial management systems can provide contractors with better visibility into their true project costs and profitability. This information is crucial for making informed bidding decisions and avoiding the financial pressures that often lead to suicide bidding.

The Future of Construction Bidding: Moving Toward Sustainable Practices

Industry Education and Awareness

The construction industry is increasingly recognizing the dangers of suicide bidding and working to educate contractors about sustainable business practices. Professional organizations, industry publications, and educational institutions are developing programs to help contractors understand the true costs of below-cost bidding and develop more sustainable approaches to business development.

Alternative Project Delivery Methods

The growing adoption of alternative project delivery methods, such as design-build, integrated project delivery, and public-private partnerships, is creating opportunities for contractors to compete on value rather than price alone. These approaches often emphasize collaboration, innovation, and long-term relationships over lowest initial cost.

Regulatory and Industry Changes

Some jurisdictions are implementing regulations designed to prevent unsustainable bidding practices, including requirements for bid bonds, proof of financial capacity, and qualifications-based selection criteria. These changes help level the playing field and reduce the incentives for suicide bidding.

The Alternative Approach

In contrast, a specialty contractor in the Southeast chose to focus on value-added services and specialized expertise rather than competing solely on price. By developing innovative construction techniques and building strong client relationships, they were able to maintain healthy profit margins even during economic downturns. This approach allowed them to weather market fluctuations, invest in new technology, and build a sustainable business that continues to thrive today.

Conclusion: Building a Sustainable Construction Future

Suicide bidding represents one of the most dangerous practices in the construction industry, offering the illusion of short-term survival while creating significant long-term risks. While the pressure to win work in competitive markets is understandable, the practice ultimately undermines the financial stability of contractors, damages industry relationships, and can lead to project failures that harm all stakeholders.

The construction industry is evolving toward more sustainable business practices that emphasize value creation, collaboration, and long-term relationships. By embracing proper cost estimation, developing specialized expertise, and focusing on quality and reliability, contractors can build profitable businesses without resorting to the dangerous gamble of suicide bidding.

Success in the modern construction industry requires a commitment to sustainable practices, continuous improvement, and ethical business conduct. Contractors who resist the temptation of suicide bidding and instead focus on building value for their clients are more likely to achieve long-term success and contribute to a healthier, more stable construction industry.

FAQs About Suicide Bidding in Construction

What drives contractors to engage in suicide bidding?

Contractors typically resort to suicide bidding during economic downturns, intense competition, or cash flow crises when they need work to keep their operations running. The practice often stems from desperation rather than strategic planning, with contractors hoping that change orders or future work will compensate for initial losses. However, this approach rarely succeeds and often leads to greater financial difficulties.

Can suicide bidding ever be profitable?

While some contractors may occasionally recover their losses through change orders or claims, suicide bidding is generally unprofitable and unsustainable. The practice relies on uncertain future opportunities that may never materialize, and even when additional work is secured, it often comes with increased disputes, damaged relationships, and compromised project quality that offset any potential gains.

How can project owners identify and avoid contractors who engage in suicide bidding?

Project owners can protect themselves by requiring proof of financial capacity, checking references and bonding history, and being suspicious of bids that are significantly below market rates or other qualified bidders. Implementing qualifications-based selection criteria, requiring detailed cost breakdowns, and working with reputable contractors with proven track records can help avoid the problems associated with suicide bidding.

‍